12 . Jurgi's Terriers 12 Jul 2011 01:21 AM
@the legend digby. dude pls could you mail me at clinton@ruggarant.co.za - wanting to do a little story. need your input. go check out ruggarant.co.za

10 . The Legend Digby 21 Jun 2011 12:38 AM
all im am saying is that if u change one person's points, then other possible mistakes on other players should be reviewed. as if lambie are reconsiderd, maybe a few other should be aswell! otherwise it should be left

8 . The Legend Digby 20 Jun 2011 10:11 PM
many of u do not realise that, if lambie hit 6 out of 6 he would have got 250 points then u wouldnt be complaining!

6 . Sak Sarel 20 Jun 2011 09:45 PM
He set up go forward ball, all were saying is, have a look, we know man of the match means nothing, but it means that he must have done something right. I watched the game and pat made at least 1 or 2 line breaks as well.

4 . Flyboy's 20 Jun 2011 08:45 PM
It is obvious you did not watch the same game, he may have missed 3 kicks but his go forward and his tackling and well and his gain in field position are not accounted for correctly FOOL!

2 . The Legend Digby 20 Jun 2011 07:08 PM
zac guildoford got given man of the match buy a website, but only because of what he did to turn the game, that break and an assist...which TURNED the game...

Pat lambie turned the game when he tackled basson who would have scored, and when he put bosman thru the gap, which yeilds only 10 testrugby points
Testruby gives points for other areas of the game, so just becuase he was man of the mathc means nothing. he also misssed 3 kicks, so think about it